Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« January 2008 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Postcards from Cabot Cove
Sunday, 20 January 2008
#12 A Question of George

[This is how I imagine
George Sutherland looks like
(it's actor George Lazenby);
every reader will have their
own way of picturing him.]
 
Greetings from Orlando, Florida, where I finally have a few moments to myself with my laptop in the middle of the North American Veterinary Conference.  Thank goodness for wireless internet access (even if I do have to pay for it). Without it, I would have missed the interesting exchange going on over at Donald Bain's website and discussion page. But thanks to the miracle of wireless technology, I've been able to be a spectator to the current exchange of ideas and opinions even as I have been stuffing my brain full of updated knowledge.

The topic of conversation, as it often is, was George Sutherland. Ever since his introduction in the first MSW novel by Donald Bain (the first edition of Gin and Daggers, to be exact), he has been a touchstone of controversy. Some readers love him, others resent him. Here's a sampling from Mr. Bain's discussion page:

"I love it when Jessica and George Sutherland are together. My only question is, why dosen't he ask her to marry him?" --Mary

"I don't want to see Jessica with anyone. It would slow her down as sleuth and diminish her individuality. ... The world is a better place with Jessica Fletcher as detective--not a lover!" --Sally

That more or less sums up the controversy.

There was never a time when George was not a controversial character. Right from the beginning, from the first moment he and Jessica met face-to-face, he was clearly presented as a potential romantic interest. Ironically, his introduction in Gin and Daggers (first published in 1989) came hard on the heels of the airing of the fifth season finale, "Mirror, Mirror, On the Wall," a pivotal episode that fueled speculation as to whether Seth Hazlitt and Jessica were about to become an item. Many fans were hoping to see the writer and the good doctor pair up by the end of the series (the fanfic term "'shipper" didn't exist back then), and many still favor this potential match. To them, George is a distraction, as Donald Bain himself has acknowledged:

"... there are some readers who resent his role in Jessica's life, especially its romantic aspects. They want Dr. Seth Hazlitt to be the one to whom she gives her heart. I can understand their feelings; Seth is a wildly popular character from the series. "

Based on the comments posted on the discussion page, however, it would seem that George Sutherland's admirers greatly outnumber his detractors. Among his fans there also is an overall frustrationover MCA/Universal's persistent refusal to allow Mr. Bain to advance the relationship in the novels, even a little bit - it would seem that even a real kiss is out-of-bounds.  The reason for this, as described by Mr. Bain, is logical enough:

"While I see them as a wonderful couple, I'm sure Universal would not want to change her status as an independant, self-sufficient woman, and I can see their point. Marriage would change everything about the series and her character, and from the standpoint of most readers, such a dramatic shift would probably be jarring. But you never know."

Renee Bain adds in a later post,

"One reason why may be because there are many new fans of the TV show--which is still in syndication--who are just discovering the books. When they find them, they have lots of expectations, as you did when you first started reading the series. We want our new readers to enjoy the books as much as you do, so we have to be careful about any drastic changes. Granted,they have occurred from time to time, but we try to stay close to the characters and feeling of the show with a few additions."

All of this is cold comfort for the fans who continue to hope that the next MSW book featuring George will carry with it a little extra magic. Fortunately for them, that's what we have fan fiction for. :)

My own opinion of George has varied widely over time; I didn't like him at first, and was dismayed (although touched) when he confessed his love for Jessica in The Highland Fling Murders. However, I have since come to appreciate him as a character and he figures prominently in my own writing.  George provides Jessica with a wonderful opportunity for character development, and since I am not bound by the rules the Bains must abide by, I can envision a deeper relationship for them and what effect it then has on them as individuals.

Here is your chance to sound off, Gentle Readers - do you like George or dislike him? Has your opinion changed over time, as mine did? Send in your comments and let your voice be heard.


Posted by jesmaine at 9:40 PM EST
Updated: Sunday, 16 March 2008 7:40 PM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (3) | Permalink

Sunday, 20 January 2008 - 10:43 PM EST

Name: "SarahB"
Home Page: http://www.sarahbsadventures.blogspot.com

1.  What?  You didn't like George?  Dismayed?   I was thrilled when I read Gin & Daggers!    I didn't come to the books until a couple of years ago.  I always liked Seth, but as a romantic interest, no thanks.   When I was young and watching the series, I always envisioned Jessica fleeing the small provencial town and running off with Michael Haggarty for for a life of intrigue and adventure.   That's partly why I like George.  He's so smart and I can see him in my mind's eye as dashing, handsome, tall, elegant - Michael Haggarty but so much more because he is also everything that Michael is not.

 2.  I resent the implications that if a woman is married she is no longer independent or self-sufficient.  Haven't we come a long way, baby?   The idea that if Jessica were to remarry she would have to be 100% devoted ot her husband is ridiculous.   These comments make it sound like life is over for married women.   I'm not married, but I have many friends who are and they are also independent women who happen to share their lives with husbands.   I think the days of married women being barefoot, pregnant and completely lorded over by their husbands are over unless there is choice to "stay at home."  At least, I hope so.   I really do think it's possible to have it all.

Monday, 21 January 2008 - 3:23 PM EST

Name: "Stephanie"

Like George?  I love George!  And have since day one, or more precisely the fall of 1989, when I first picked up “Gin and Daggers.”  Like Sarah, I’ve always liked Seth but never as a romantic interest, just as a very good friend.  And Michael?  Oh, Michael!  He is a charmer but not quite right for Jessica.  George is perfect.  In my mind’s eye, he is charming and intelligent like Michael but without all of the malarkey.  He is tall, handsome, unassuming, patient, gracious, loyal, and protective without being smothering (just to name a few).

 

Should Jessica ever remarry?  Honestly, I don’t know.  That’s up to her.  But if she were to remarry, George would have my vote.  As for Jessica losing her individuality and self-sufficiency – no way!  That would never happen.  As a married woman, I actually kind of resent that comment a little bit.  I have married friends who hold college degrees who are stay-at-home moms by choice.  I have other friends who are married and who are also successful accountants, university professors, and doctors, (some moms and some not) and yet somehow have managed to remain individuals.  Sarah’s comment about an independent woman sharing her life with her husband is very appropriate.  In my opinion, marriage is about sharing your life and your dreams, not giving up yours for your husband’s. 

 

Would Jessica be completely devoted to George?  Of course she would.  But devotion takes many forms.  It can be just as much about the small day to day things as it is about the big, life-changing things.  I certainly don’t see her selling her home in Cabot Cove, giving up her apartment in NYC, and giving up teaching and writing to go live in London and spend her days cooking and cleaning, nor do I see George expecting her to.  Personally, I’d like to think that the two of them would find a way to have a successful romantic relationship (whether it included marriage or not).

 

As for the Murder, She Wrote books – it is unlikely that Universal will ever let Jessica and George’s relationship flourish but I wouldn’t mind if the Bains slipped in a few hints now and again that might indicate that there is indeed a little bit of romance taking place between them (more frequent phone calls, emails, flowers, cards, surprise visits, whatever).

Wednesday, 23 January 2008 - 10:00 PM EST

Name: "Lizz"
Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/welovedrseth/index.html

Do I like George? I honestly don't have a definite answer to that question. I suppose the best answer is that I tolerate him. I think he's just a little bit too perfect. However, I am also biased in favor of Seth. I mean, I helped found a club around his character, and I've always felt that when they changed the ending of Mirror, Mirror, they left something important out.

I also can't really say whether or not my opinion of George has changed. I think it has a little bit, and I think I like him just a bit more than I did when I first started reading the books. I will admit that I'm not a huge Donald Bain fan, and I haven't read the last few books that have come out.

To sum up my ramblings, I like George in that he's an interesting character and a good friend to Jessica, but I personally would like to see him remain just a friend.

View Latest Entries